Skip to main content
  • Skip to Content
  • Skip to Main Navigation
  • Skip to Search

LSMRCE

     

Open Search
  • Students
    • Fermilab SIST Program
    • Internships
    • LSAMP Resume Book
    • National Association of LSAMP Alumni (NALA)
    • What can I do with my STEM degree?
    • Student Speaker Series
    • Post-Baccalaureate Programs
  • Faculty
    • External Funding
    • LSMRCE Faculty Champions
    • Mentoring Resources
    • Research Mini-Grants
    • Tony Quinn Award
  • Events
    • NSF LSAMP PI/PD Meeting
    • Annual Conference
    • Eaton Events
  • LSAMP Community
    • About LSAMP
    • About Louis Stokes
    • Bridge Doctorate
    • Centers of Excellence
    • National Association of LSAMP Alumni (NALA)
    • LSAMP Community Map
    • LSAMP Model
    • LSAMP Success Stories
    • LSAMP 30th Anniversary
    • GRE Fee Reduction Waiver for LSAMPs
  • Publications
    • NSF PAPPG 2023
    • NSF LSAMP 22-584 Program Solicitation
    • NSF LSAMP 20-590 Program Solicitation
    • 2020 LSAMP Trailblazers Magazine
    • 2018 LSAMP Magazine
    • LSAMP Special Issue Manuscripts
  • About Us
    • Leadership Team
    • Advisory Board
    • LSMRCE Partner Schools
    • Midwest LSAMP Alliances
    • Working Groups
    • Video Library
    • LSMCE Library
  • Digital Library

Louis Stokes Midwest Regional Center of Excellence

  • Home
  • Students
    • Fermilab SIST Program
    • Internships
    • LSAMP Resume Book
    • National Association of LSAMP Alumni (NALA)
    • What can I do with my STEM degree?
    • Student Speaker Series
    • Post-Baccalaureate Programs
  • Faculty
    • External Funding
    • LSMRCE Faculty Champions
    • Mentoring Resources
    • Research Mini-Grants
    • Tony Quinn Award
  • Events
    • NSF LSAMP PI/PD Meeting
    • Annual Conference
    • Eaton Events
  • LSAMP Community
    • About LSAMP
    • About Louis Stokes
    • Bridge Doctorate
    • Centers of Excellence
    • National Association of LSAMP Alumni (NALA)
    • LSAMP Community Map
    • LSAMP Model
    • LSAMP Success Stories
    • LSAMP 30th Anniversary
    • GRE Fee Reduction Waiver for LSAMPs
  • Publications
    • NSF PAPPG 2023
    • NSF LSAMP 24-563 Solicitation
    • 2020 LSAMP Trailblazers Magazine
    • 2018 LSAMP Magazine
    • LSAMP Special Issue Manuscripts
  • About Us
    • Leadership Team
    • Advisory Board
    • LSMRCE Partner Schools
    • Midwest LSAMP Alliances
    • Working Groups
    • Video Library
    • LSMCE Library
  • Digital Library

  • Home/ Events/ 2023 LSMRCE Conference/ 2023 LSMRCE Conference/ Poster Abstract Rubric

Poster Abstract Rubric

Poster abstracts are scored based on this rubric. Abstracts that earn 24 points or greater out of 42 possible points will be invited to participate in the competitive poster session.

Level of Achievement (point value)
Category Beginner (0-2) Competent (3-4) Proficient (5-6) Points Earned:
General adherence to the Abstract Guidelines The abstract does not follow the abstract guidelines, components are missing, or the abstract exceeds the 250-word count maximum. The abstract appears to have the correct format and components but does not meet all the guidelines or contains errors. The abstract adheres to all the abstract guidelines, appears well-formatted, and contains all components. __/6
Title The title is missing or not informative. The title is informative and appropriate, yet is incomplete, contains errors, or is written in an unscientific tone. The title is complete and informative and written in scientific terms. __/6
Author Names, Department and School Affiliation The author(s), the departments, or the school affiliations are missing. The authors, department, and school affiliations are present but do not fully follow the format guidelines. The authors, departments, and school affiliations are present and adhere to the format guidelines. __/6
Overall Abstract Body The abstract is poorly written, leaving questions about the purpose and relevance of the research. The abstract is mostly well written and makes a good case for the importance of the research. The abstract is well-written, concise, void of mistakes, and convinces the reader of the importance of the research. __/6
Purpose and Methodology The purpose and methodology are missing. The purpose and methodology are present but lack clarity or are not stated in scientific terms. The research purpose and methodology are clear and are stated using scientific terminology. __/6
Results The results are missing, not complete, or not relevant to the experiment. The results are provided but lack numerical data or clear alignment with the research question. The results address the research question and are presented using numerical data. __/6
Conclusions The section is missing or does not reflect knowledge relevant to the experiment. The conclusions provide some insight into what these research results mean in the context of their research but lack an understanding of larger implications. The conclusions are based on the results and provide clear implications for their research as well as in the larger context. __/6
Total Score: __/42

Louis Stokes Midwest Regional Center of Excellence

Chicago State University
9501 S King Dr.
Chicago, IL 60628


IUPUI
755 W. Michigan St., UL 1140
Indianapolis, IN 46202
: (317)-278-4753
: inlsamp@iu.edu
  • "YouTube"
  • "Twitter"
  • "LinkedIn"

The Louis Stokes Midwest Regional Center of Excellence is funded by the National Science Foundation award numbers HRD-1826626 (IUPUI) and HRD-1826719 (CSU)(2018-2023).

NSF logo
YouTube subscribe button
Tweets by LSMRCE

Accessibility | Privacy Notice | Copyright @ The Trustees of Indiana University

➤